:: Bersa Talk ::

A community for Bersa handgun enthusiasts.
Welcome to :: Bersa Talk :: Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

illegal seizures of your firearms

Last post 09-01-2008, 8:36 PM by Im a Colt 38. Super baby. 14 replies.
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  06-08-2008, 4:21 PM 77383

    illegal seizures of your firearms

    What would you do? What could you do?

    I can not believe that this happened in our country!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sm5PC7z79-8&NR=1

    RT


    VOTE McCain/PALIN, OUR SUPREME COURT AS YOU KNOW IT, IS AT STAKE!

    Bersa T380
    Bersa T9
    Bersa U.C. .45
    F/S 1911 Deluxe
  •  06-08-2008, 6:06 PM 77415 in reply to 77383

    Re: illegal seizures of your firearms

    Well, I watched both videos and now I'm furious. Angry [:@] 

    Law enforcement must not be above the law like that. This isn't right. The Constitution means absolutely nothing to these people.


    p-t-max

    I'm no expert, I'm just, well---opinionated!

    http://blog648.blogspot.com/





  •  06-08-2008, 6:24 PM 77420 in reply to 77383

    Re: illegal seizures of your firearms

    As of September 1, 2007, such confiscations of weapons during times of emergency are ILLEGAL in Texas.  Again, they're gettin' some things right in Austin.
  •  06-09-2008, 6:09 AM 77496 in reply to 77420

    Re: illegal seizures of your firearms

    I think that these measures will be attempted again in the future,but the next time citizens will be fighting back,as History does tend to repeat itself.

    JC40

    Victory attained by violence is tantamount to a defeat,for it is momentary.



    Mini Firestorm .40
    Sig Sauer P220
    CZ Rami .40
    S&W Airweight 38 spl
    Taurus PT111 9mm
    Pheonix arms .22
  •  06-09-2008, 7:32 AM 77517 in reply to 77496

    Re: illegal seizures of your firearms

    Another thing that made me so furious was to see American soldiers (National Guard) in an American city, fully prepared to engage and fire upon American citizens. Fully prepared to shed American blood. But not in defense of America, or American citizens, or the U.S. Constitution, in keeping with their oath. Just following orders to disarm American citizens, in violation of the 2nd Amendment, and being totally ready to murder anyone who offered resistance. I tell you, I'm so mad I could spit.  
    p-t-max

    I'm no expert, I'm just, well---opinionated!

    http://blog648.blogspot.com/





  •  06-09-2008, 8:59 AM 77542 in reply to 77517

    Re: illegal seizures of your firearms

    You know this did happen a few years ago right? That isn't to say you shouldn't be upset, you should, but I did all my gnashing of teeth and letter writing about this time in 2006. Hence, a lot of states passed or attempted to pass laws like Texas did in 2007. (ok so I wasn't the only one to write, they didn't do it because I said so).

    This ties in with the thread michael t has going right now, our increasingly military like police departments.
    To those who have studied history, this bears a resemblance to a lot of eastern Europe in the early 20th century. Certainly the circumstances are different now but the mindset is the same "The government loves us and will take care of us, let's let them."  "We want change."  Let's socialize the medical system. It's not fair that someone is successful, they must share with the rest. Sound familiar? Have we heard anything like this lately?  I know, this is the choir, I'll shut up now.

    The question remains, will the laws that we were able to enact in several states do a lick of good? Not if martial law is imposed.
    martial law n : the body of law imposed by the military over civilian affairs (usually in time of war or civil crisis); overrides civil law.Suspension of habeus corpus, of ordinary law and due process of government in a time of military crisis or imminent danger to the state such as invasion or insurrection.

    Here is an interesting paper written for Congress that details a few times martial law has been used in the US. Martial Law and National Emergency

    Here's what the supreme court said about it (albeit a long time ago):
    "Martial law is the will of the commanding officer of an armed force, or of a geographical military department, expressed in time of war within the limits of his military jurisdiction, as necessity demands and prudence dictates, restrained or enlarged by the orders of his military chief, or supreme executive ruler."

    Here's what makes it legal,
    The US Constitution at Article 1, ¶9 states: "The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

    So, now what? Vote.  I'm talking about from the ground up. Take an interest in who you vote for on the neighborhood comittee for mailbox beautification ordinance enforcement. These are the people that go on to run for Mayor, Senator, Governor and Congressman.

    I'd like to see it work out for our kids, myself.

    If all you're goin' on is my confession, forget it, I'm simply not credible. - Dale
  •  06-09-2008, 11:38 AM 77573 in reply to 77542

    Re: illegal seizures of your firearms

    here is what I think is going on,the U.N. is trying for a one world goverment.And to do that they have to start disarming every nation on the face of the earth.I also beleive they have tried in a number of countries with their version of gun control,which hasn't exactly worked.They believe if they can take away your right to bear arms which is your right under the 2nd amendment in the U.S.A. The rest of the world will follow.And there you will have a one world goverment for all to live by.I say lets kick the U.N. out of this country and tell them to kiss our all American Asses,And too try taking our guns.


    john h
  •  06-09-2008, 12:17 PM 77586 in reply to 77573

    Re: illegal seizures of your firearms

    Talking about politics.  The mayor that did such a terrible job after Katrina was re-elected following the storm.  Apparently the people weren't too upset that he confiscated their weapons.

    Info about him: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Nagin

     

     

  •  06-09-2008, 12:28 PM 77590 in reply to 77542

    Re: illegal seizures of your firearms

    Habeas Corpus is already shelved. Our sitting Pres reserves the right to respect or ignore  ANY individual's right to appeal or due process, including citizens. This assumed right is now going to be inherited by every sitting President untill ....  What's absolutely amazing to me is that only Ron Paul had anything to say about restoring it. Where the H**L is the press on this one? Why are none of the candidates talking about restoring it? This is a fundamental right of free people going back hundreds of years!, and it's already starting to collect dust. Left, Right, Conservative, Liberal, who can successfully argue that it's "outdated" ?   I've always prided myself on stepping out to vote, and I'll continue to do so, but it doesn't seem to make any difference even when my candidate/party wins. Guess it's a private joke among politicos and I'm not in on it.

     

    I'm not worried about the UN. They can't even hand out food effectively, let alone occupy a heavily armed country. Unless they get plenty of help from our own armed forces, what country would be dumb enough to send troops here to collect firearms? I'll


    "Therefore every time you kill a beast of prey, you should feel as though your own bones are being crushed and you are preparing to die with it, laughing in the face of death. That's the attitude of a true hunter."

    Shosan - 17th century samurai/monk
  •  06-09-2008, 12:28 PM 77591 in reply to 77542

    Re: illegal seizures of your firearms

    Habeas Corpus is already shelved. Our sitting Pres reserves the right to respect or ignore  ANY individual's right to appeal or due process, including citizens. This assumed right is now going to be inherited by every sitting President untill ....  What's absolutely amazing to me is that only Ron Paul had anything to say about restoring it. Where the H**L is the press on this one? Why are none of the candidates talking about restoring it? This is a fundamental right of free people going back hundreds of years!, and it's already starting to collect dust. Left, Right, Conservative, Liberal, who can successfully argue that it's "outdated" ?   I've always prided myself on stepping out to vote, and I'll continue to do so, but it doesn't seem to make any difference even when my candidate/party wins. Guess it's a private joke among politicos and I'm not in on it.

     

    I'm not worried about the UN. They can't even hand out food effectively, let alone occupy a heavily armed country. Unless they get plenty of help from our own armed forces, what country would be dumb enough to send troops here to collect firearms? I'll worry


    "Therefore every time you kill a beast of prey, you should feel as though your own bones are being crushed and you are preparing to die with it, laughing in the face of death. That's the attitude of a true hunter."

    Shosan - 17th century samurai/monk
  •  06-09-2008, 12:28 PM 77592 in reply to 77542

    Re: illegal seizures of your firearms

    Habeas Corpus is already shelved. Our sitting Pres reserves the right to respect or ignore  ANY individual's right to appeal or due process, including citizens. This assumed right is now going to be inherited by every sitting President untill ....  What's absolutely amazing to me is that only Ron Paul had anything to say about restoring it. Where the H**L is the press on this one? Why are none of the candidates talking about restoring it? This is a fundamental right of free people going back hundreds of years!, and it's already starting to collect dust. Left, Right, Conservative, Liberal, who can successfully argue that it's "outdated" ?   I've always prided myself on stepping out to vote, and I'll continue to do so, but it doesn't seem to make any difference even when my candidate/party wins. Guess it's a private joke among politicos and I'm not in on it.

     

    I'm not worried about the UN. They can't even hand out food effectively, let alone occupy a heavily armed country. Unless they get plenty of help from our own armed forces, what country would be dumb enough to send troops here to collect firearms? I'll worry when Halliburton gets the contract to churn out a couple hundred thousand blue helmets. 


    "Therefore every time you kill a beast of prey, you should feel as though your own bones are being crushed and you are preparing to die with it, laughing in the face of death. That's the attitude of a true hunter."

    Shosan - 17th century samurai/monk
  •  06-09-2008, 1:00 PM 77597 in reply to 77592

    Re: illegal seizures of your firearms

    a lot of countries would america doesn't own america any more time to wake up and smell the coffee as the saying goes troubled times are heading this way
    john h
  •  06-09-2008, 2:23 PM 77610 in reply to 77415

    Re: illegal seizures of your firearms

    P-T max,

    I was trying to stir it up, yes it was during Katrina several years ago. Where's the outcry?

    Did you notice that these LEO'S aren't carrying your dept issued Barnies .38 or a Glock!

    RT


    VOTE McCain/PALIN, OUR SUPREME COURT AS YOU KNOW IT, IS AT STAKE!

    Bersa T380
    Bersa T9
    Bersa U.C. .45
    F/S 1911 Deluxe
  •  06-09-2008, 2:36 PM 77612 in reply to 77610

    Re: illegal seizures of your firearms

    Hi All.  Just back from vacation.  What a great thread.  In case anyone out there has missed it, Jeff Synder of American Handgunner Magazine has put together what I consider to be a landmark series of articles on the subject of defending our Second Ammendment Rights in a way that could actually work.  I have no delusions that I could keep my arms it the face of gang of well equiped thugs (badges or none), but I think we all could by unified non-violent action as Synder outlines.

    DET

    http://www.americanhandgunner.com/GunRght1.html


    DET
  •  09-01-2008, 8:36 PM 93943 in reply to 77383

    Re: illegal seizures of your firearms

    wow!!!!
    Bersa U/C 45, Colt 38 super Commander,Colt 38 super Combat Commander,Colt 38 Super hi capacity Goverment model, Springfield G.I 45, Star 45 cal,Star 9mm, FEG 9mm, Browing hi power 9mm, Maverick 12 gauge, Ruger mini 14 ranch,Romanian SAR-1.
View as RSS news feed in XML
Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems